From Farms to Factories

The week's readings and discussion, specifically regarding the transformation from traditional local family farms to the profit driven agricultural system brought to mind a discussion I attended held by the Waterloo Region Food System Roundtable, entitled "How Much Should We Pay for Food?" There were five panelists from differing backgrounds speaking about food cost and accessibility to local, fresh food. What stood out for me was the accessibility (or lack of) to local, fresh food. We've discussed in class that the unfortunate reality of low-income families is that they often do not have the resources to access local, fresh food and are uneducation about food. One panelist Laura Callum, a Community Nutrition Worker, spoke of a program that serves a demographic consisting of mostly women and new Canadians. The program teaches food preparation skills, how to buy quality food as opposed to convenience food, informs about buying local, and encourages the rituals of preparing and eating food as community. This program is important as it is not only imparting wisdom about food and the process of cooking but about the importance of buying local and eating well. This encourages supporting local farms and farmers as opposed to putting profit into the agriculture system that produces food in unhealthy, unethical environments. I think it is important to start this movement at a local level and raise awareness, impart wisdom in the community about the realities of the food we consume and the effects it has on humans and our environment.
For anyone interested, I have posted a link that takes you to the Waterloo Region Food System Roundtable website and allows you to look at a forum that discusses this event in further detail. http://www.wrfoodsystem.ca/index.php?p=forum/view_thread&thread_id=10127

Technological Change and the Environment

Recently, my laptop of three years stopped functioning. I brought it to a repair shop where I was told that they could centre the problem area but because the computer was older the necessary parts would be next to impossible to locate and it would be in my best interest to purchase a new computer, financially and time-wise. I am now left with an un-usable computer (borrowing a family member’s) until such time as I decide how to deal with it – the information from this week’s readings, presentation and film have made me think much more about this. It is simple to disconnect ourselves from what happens to the product once we dispose of it. E-waste results from this increase in production that makes it difficult for computer repairpersons, let alone the consumers, to locate parts. This situation is a result of the treadmill of production, the new and improved products are produced rapidly and citizens are so eager to upgrade. For this reason it becomes too difficult to locate parts from computers designed two years prior, it is more time and cost effective to purchase new and waste the old. Changes need to occur in the process of producing and consuming technology, e-waste is severely damaging the environment and human beings, as illustrated in the film. I believe in the concept of Product Stewardship, it seems to me it is fundamental in the future management of e-waste; the product and everyone involved in the lifespan of the product are meant to be centred on reducing environmental impact. This should involve everyone from the birth to the death of the product, including the government, corporations, producers, and consumers. Consumers have a responsibility to increase their knowledge of products and recognize that we hold power in the cycle of production and consumption - what we choose not to consume will eventually discontinue. So, as consumers, we can make a choice to purchase that which will be more sustainable for humans and the environment.